Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14297 (CHH)

MAHESHWARI YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3626/2026 · 2026-04-26

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19289 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3626 of 2026 1 - Maheshwari Yadav W/o- Shri Gajanand Yadav Aged About 28 Years R/o- Village - Rendakhamhi. Tahsil- Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Additional Collector Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 3 - Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Services Project Officer Sahaspur Lohara,district- Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Chilef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 5 - Block Health Officer, Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer, Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 7 - Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Kholwa, Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 8 - Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kholwa, Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 9 - Smt. Manisha Sahu W/o- Parmanand Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o- Village- Rendakhamhi, Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 2 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Lekhram Dhruw, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 27 /04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner from the possession of the concerned respondent. 10.2. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Respondent No. 2. 10.3. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned order dated 17.12.2025 (Annexure P-2), passed by the Respondent No. 3. 10.4. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to restore the order dated 29.10.2024 (Annexure P- passed by the Respondent No. 3 and consequently the petitioner may be appointed on the post of Anganbadi Sahayika.. 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) which the Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; 10.6. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to award the cost of petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondents/State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that petitioner is having the alternate efficacious remedy under Rule 5 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other remedy available under the law. 3 4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under law. Registry is directed to return back certified copy of the documents after retaining photocopies of the same. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY