Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14296 (HP)

HRTC v. NARESH KUMAR

CMP.M/753/2026 · 2026-07-06

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HRTC Vs. Naresh Kumar & ors. CMPs(M) No.753 & 754 of 2026 & CMP No.11066 of 2026 in FAO No.109 of 2008 06.07.2026 Present: None for the non-applicant/appellant. Mr. N.K.Bhalla, Advocate, or the applicants/respondents No.1 to 3. CMPs(M) No.753 & 754 of 2026 The present application under Order 22, Rule 4 of CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act have been filed to implead/bring on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1, after condonation of delay and setting aside the abatement. 2. As per the applicants, respondent No.1, Naresh Kumar had expired on 29.08.2024 and left behind his legal representatives, as mentioned in para-5 of the application [CMP(M) No.753 of 2026), who are required to be brought on record. The applications are duly supported by the affidavits of applicants No.1 to 3, namely Meenakshi, Bipanshu & Seema, respectively, as well as death and legal heirs certificate, Annexures A-4 & A-5, respectively. 3. Heard. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the present applications are allowed and the legal heir of deceased respondent No.1-Naresh Kumar, as mentioned in para-4 of the application {CMP(M) No.753 of 2026}, are ordered to be brought on record, after setting aside the abatement, if any. Amended memo of parties filed alongwith the application {CMP(M) No.754 of 2026} is ordered to be taken on record. 4. The applications stand disposed of. CMP No.11066 of 2026 At the request of learned counsel for the applicants, list after two weeks. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 06, 2026 (V.Himalvi)