IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118
 Date of Decision:- 18.03.2026
   ....Petitioner(s) Versus     
...Respondent(s)
  


   
SANJIV BERRY   !"#!$! 
%
!"!&!#'$ ($)
!*!#!!+ ,,,,   

    !"   1. The petitioners, in the present petition, have assailed the provisional attachment order dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) on various grounds. 2. Learned counsel for E.D., however, informs at the very outset that the said provisional attachment has since been confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 17.03.2026. 3. As such, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal u/s 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. " 

 (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE #$% S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2026.03.19 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment