Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14293 (BOM)

VINOD SURESH PAWASE v. THE TAHASILDAR VADGAON MAVAL AND ANR

WP/12435/2026 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

TSB 45-wp-12435-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12435 OF 2026 Mr. Vinod Suresh Pawase … Petitioner V/s. The Tahsildar, Vadgaon-Maval & Anr. … Respondents Ms. Saroj N. Pagare for the Petitioner. Dr. Dhruti M. Kapadia, AGP, for the Respondent -State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 29th September, 2026 P.C.:- 1) In our view, the present Petition as drafted and presented before this Court, does not conform to the prescribed norms of drafting and presentation of a Petition. Faced with this difficulty, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw Petition, with liberty to file a properly worded Petition on the same cause of action. 1.1) Leave and liberty granted. 2) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1 TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2026.10.05 10:21:26 +0530