HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 582/2026 Rakesh Kumar ….. Petitioner(s)/ Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Ajay Bakshi, Advocate q vs UT of J&K .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 05.06.2026 01. Learned counsel for the petitioner after brief submissions has submitted that he will be satisfied, if learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Akhnoor [“the trial Court”] is directed to consider the matter afresh in the light of grounds urged in the present petition and law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “K. Jagdish vs. Udaya Kumar G. S. and Anr.” AIR 2020 SC 936, “Kathyayini vs. Sidharth P. S. Reddy and Ors.”2025 SCC Online SC 1428 and “Kamaladevi Agarwal vs. State of West Bengal” AIR 2001 SC 3846. 02. In view of limited nature of controversy and innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is disposed of with a direction to learned trial Court to consider the complaint preferred by the petitioner afresh and pass the appropriate order, as per law. 03. Disposed of. (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge Jammu 05.06.2026 Riya Sr. No. 98