IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27034 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2024 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Nakat Gope@ Nakat @ Nakat Rai @ Rajesh Gop S/o Late Jay Ram Ray @ Late Jairam Rai @ Late Jai Gop Resident of Mitanchak Brajesh Singh ke makan me kirayedar, PS- Sampatchak, District- Patna, Permanent address - Patipul Digha, PS- Digha, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh- Sr. Advocate Mr.Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 14-05-2026 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the fourth attempt of the petitioner to seek regular bail. It is next submitted that in the third attempt, the petitioner had moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.81415 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 26.02.2026 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 25.03.2026 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27034 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 as would manifest from the order impugned. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above- named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail- bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No.493 of 2026 arising out of Digha P. S. Case No.293 of 2024, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his wife namely, Sunita Devi. 6. The application stands allowed. 7. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying the delay in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T