Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14286 (GAU)

DIPANJALI GOSWAMI v. MAMATA HOJAI, AES

Cont.Cas(C)/200/2024 · 2026-09-13

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010078452024 2026:GAU-AS:13500 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/200/2024 DIPANJALI GOSWAMI WIFE OF GIRIN GOSWAMI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- OUTALA, P.O.- KENDUA, P.S.- BAIHATA CHARIALI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN -781121. VERSUS MAMATA HOJAI, AES DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI- 781019, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY, MS N MAHANTA,N GAUTAM,MR. R M DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MR. U SARMA,MR. N J KHATANIAR BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 14-09-2026 1. Heard Mr. R.M. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, Page No.# 2/2 learned counsel for the respondents. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that pursuant to the judgment and order dated 12.04.2023, passed in WP(C) No. 1546/2022 and other connected writ petitions, so far relating to the present petitioner, a Speaking Order dated 14.09.2026 has been passed. 3. Since the judgment and order dated 12.04.2023 (supra) has already been complied with, the present contempt petition stands closed. 4. Copy of the Speaking Order dated 14.09.2026 (supra) be furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. It is needless to say that in the event, the petitioner is aggrieved by the Speaking Order, she shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of her grievance. JUDGE Comparing Assistant