Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14286 (AP)

K NAGALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/423/2026 · 2026-01-06

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010005052026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [0] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO: 423/2026 Between: K Nagalakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.423 of 2026 O R DE R: 1. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.4 in issuing impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.E5/DMHO/CTR/2026, dated 02.01.2026, cancelling the earlier posting orders issued to the Petitioner to work at Medikurthy Primary Health Center under the control of Respondent No.5 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The Petitioner was appointed as Female Nursing Orderly on outsourcing basis vide Orders dated 08.02.2022 and posted at Primary Health Center, Chinthaparthy. Subsequently, the Petitioner was posted at P.H.C Medikurthy considering the family situation of the Petitioner. However, vide impugned Order, the deputation of the Petitioner at P.H.C. Medikurthy was cancelled by the Respondent No.4 and the Petitioner was directed to report at PHC Chinthaparthy. Questioning the same, the present Writ Petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that taking into consideration the family scenario of the Petitioner, the Petitioner ought to have been continued at the Primary Health Center, 3 Medikurthy and the impugned Order, which was issued without assigning any reason, cannot be sustained. 4. Sri S. Raju, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the representation of the Petitioner dated 25.11.2025 would be examined and appropriate orders will be passed. 5. Heard the respective counsel. 6. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions: i) The Respondents are directed to examine the representation of the Petitioner dated 25.11.2025 and pass appropriate orders by taking into consideration the family situation of the Petitioner. ii) Till the representation of the Petitioner dated 25.11.2025 is decided, the Petitioner shall be continued at Primary Health Centre, Medikurthy. iii) There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. _________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 07.01.2026 eha 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:423/2026 Dt. 07.01.2026 eha