Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14281 (AP)

SHAIK JAFFARHUSSANE v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/464/2026 · 2026-01-06

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010004442026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 464/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK JAFFARHUSSANE, C/O., SHAIK IMAM SAB, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, TEMPORARILY RESIDING IN STREET NO. 18, BLOCK NO.7, KAITHAN TOWN, KUWAIT PERMANENT RESIDENT OF TURAKA PALLE, THIMMASAMUDHRAM VILLAGE,T SUNDUPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PIN 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTI,ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT PIN 516115 3. THE TAHSILDAR, T. SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT PIN 516310 4. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, , T. SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. PIN 516310 ...RESPONDENT(S): The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: <to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not considering the representation dated 01.08.2025 for conducting survey for demarcation of the Petitioner's agriculture land measuring an extent of Ac. 4.25 cents out of Ac. 24.75 cents situated in Sy.No. 617/1 of Thimasamudhram village, T Sundupalli Mandal, Annamayya District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequentially direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents to conduct survey for demarcation of the Petitioner agriculture land situated in Sy.No. 617/1 of Thimasamudhram village, T Sundupalli Mandal, Annamayya District forthwith and pass…..= 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, although the petitioner submitted a representation dated 01.08.2025 to the 3rd respondent seeking conduct of survey and demarcation of the petitioner’s agricultural land admeasuring Ac.4.25 cents out of Ac.24.75 cents, situated in Survey No.617/1 of Thimasamudhram Village, T. Sundupalli Mandal, Annamayya District, the respondent authorities have neither considered the said representation nor issued any proceedings thereon. Hence, the present writ petition. 4. Considering the same, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider the F-line application submitted by the petitioner dated 01.08.2025, seeking conduct of survey and demarcation of the petitioner’s agricultural land, and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other stakeholders, if any, within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 07.01.2026 klk 175 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.464 of 2026 07.01.2026 kkllkk