Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14278 (BOM)

KIRAN KHIMANAND PANDEY (MRS.KIRAN DEEPAK VERMA) v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

WP/5680/2025 · 2026-09-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

KSG 8-WP-5680-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5680 OF 2025 Kiran Khimanand Pandey (Mrs.Kiran Deepak Verma) … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent _______________________________________ Mr. Prakash Dhopatkar, Ms.Vithika S. Vhatkar i/b Santosh Vhatkar and Associates for the Petitioner. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. Mr. Digvijay Patil, P.I. attached to Borivali Police Station, Mumbai. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. : 1) According to us, the present Petition is thoroughly misconceived. According to us there is no provisions in law, for directing the police Officer to give C.D.R. record of telephone conversation between client and his Advocate. 2) Petition is accordingly dismissed in limine. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 1/1 KIRAN SANJAY GHUGE Digitally signed by KIRAN SANJAY GHUGE Date: 2026.10.05 18:47:09 +0530