1 2026:HHC:26671 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 104 of 2026 Decided on: 06.07.2026 ________________________________________________ Madhu Vashisht & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Man Mohan Sharma & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Umesh Kanwar Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Respondent No. 3, Mr. J.S. Ahlawat, present in person. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) It has been stated in the reply filed by respondents No. 1 & 2 that the petitioners have not presented their sale deeds before the competent registration authority for registration and have also not produced any registered sale deed before respondent No. 2 for attestation of mutation. Therefore, in the absence of presentation of sale 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:26671 deeds, it could not be possible to register the sale deed and got the same mutated. 2. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would submit the necessary documents with the competent authority within a period of four weeks from today. 3. On submitting the requisite documents, the respondents are directed to comply with the judgment under reference in its letter and spirit within a period of four weeks’ thereafter. 4. The contempt petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 5. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 6th June, 2026 Judge (raman)