Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9128 WP No. 18520 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 18520 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SRI.P.RAJU S/O. LATE PARAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
2. SMT.PADMA D/O. LATE PARAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
3.
DEVARAJU. P S/O LATE PARAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT OMBATHANAKUNTE VILLAGE, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ROHITH.B FOR SRI. NAGESH S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGRA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA-562159. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9128 WP No. 18520 of 2025
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGRA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA-562159.
4.
THE THASILDAR, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA-562159 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM IMPUGNED
ORDER PASSED BY 4TH RESPONDENT ON 27-03-2025 IN R.R.T.(D) 409/2024-25 (ANNEXURE-A) IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY.NO.57/4 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 15 GUNTAS SITUATED AT OAMBATHANAKUNTE VILLAGE, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI, AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY 4TH RESPONDENT ON 27-03-2025 IN R.R.T.(D) 409/2024-25 (ANNEXURE-A) IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY.NO. 57/4 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 0.15 GUNTAS OUT OF 0.31 GUNTAS SITUATED AT OAMBATHANAKUNTE VILLAGE, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the order impugned is questionable before the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136 (2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Therefore, learned counsel seeks
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9128 WP No. 18520 of 2025 leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and to approach the Assistant Commissioner.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioners as prayed for. However, the petitioners are required to pay the Court fee. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6