GOPAL SINGH S/O SHRI LATE RAJA MOHABBAT SINGH v. NARAIN SINGH S/O SHRI DHAN SINGH
CW/5839/2026 · 2026-08-31
Sudesh Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14264 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14264 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:34929] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5839/2026 CNR: RJHC020285632026 | URN: CW / 12872U / 2026 Gopal Singh S/o Shri Late Raja Mohabbat Singh, Aged About 77 Years, Resident of-Lalpura House, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur. Currently Residing At-House No. 16, Gulmohar Lane-II, Hanuman Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Narain Singh S/o Shri Dhan Singh, Resident of Resident of - Lalpura House, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur.
2. Smt. Kalyani Devi W/o Shri Dhan Singh, Resident of - Lalpura House, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur. (Since Deceased)
3. Kirloskar Coplend Limited, Through Hari Krishanan
4. Triveni Computer Forms, Through Madhu Sudan Sharma,
5. Sterling Holiday Resorts (India) Limited, Through Kishan Waliya
6. Forbs Gokhakh Limited, Through Pushpendra Singh
7. Citiling Creation, Through Vishal Vyas ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Rawat Mr. Vishwas Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 31/08/2026
1. Petitioner is defendant and by means of filing instant civil writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prays for directions to expedite the proceedings to permit the final decree of partition by the Additional District Judge No.4, Jaipur
[2026:RJ-JP:34929] (2 of 2) [CW-5839/2026] Metropolitan-II, pursuant to the preliminary decree dated 31.08.2012 passed in Civil Suit for Partition bearing No.96/2009.
2. Undisputedly, against the preliminary decree for partition dated 31.08.2012, S.B. Civil First Appeal No.680/2012 has been filed by respondent No.1 and in that appeal, the Coordinate Bench of this High Court vide order dated 28.04.2014, has stayed the pronouncement of the final decree till pendency of first appeal.
3. In that view of the matter, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to move an appropriate application at least to proceed with the proceedings of final decree, in the pending first appeal.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J 7/NITIN