[108] Dilbagh Sin Anurag V Financial C Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] against the dated 06.1 [2] speaking o The same learned cou [3] required to However, order, in a 23.03.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-738 Date of De agh Singh and others versus Verma, Addl. Chief Secretary ncial Commissioner to Govt. of Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Pankaj Bains, Advocate fo Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, A **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the contempt pe nst the respondents for wilfully and 06.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed Today, learned State Coun king order(s) dated 06.03.2026 pass same is taken on record. A copy ed counsel for the petitioners. In view of the compliance ired to be passed. The present con ever, liberty is granted to the petitio r, in accordance with law, if the grie .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 738-2026 of Decision : 23.03.2026 …Petitioners retary-cum- Punjab & Ors. ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN cate for the petitioners. Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. pt petition is for initiating actio lly and deliberately disobeying orde passed in CWP-32746-2025. Counsel has produced a copy o 6 passed by the competent authority copy thereof has been supplied t liance made, no further orders ar nt contempt petition is disposed of petitioners to assail the said speakin he grievance still survives. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No action g order opy of thority. lied to ers are sed off. peaking RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.23 17:51 I agree to specified portions of this document