Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14262 (ALL)

ANSAR AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/24485/2025 · 2026-10-05

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24485 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. 2. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for state respondents 1,2 and 3. 3. Perused the record. 4. Petitioner - Ansar Ahmad has approached this Court by means of the present writ petition, challenging the impugned FIR dated 23.7.2025, lodged by first informant respondent 4, S.I. Kajal Kaushal and registered as Case Crime No. 223 of 2023 under Sections 3/5/8 U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Sheeshgarh, District Bareilly. 5. On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer, upon completion of statutory investigation of aforesaid Case Crime Number has submitted the charge sheet under Section 193(3) BNSS. 6. On the above premise, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition any further. Learned AGA representing state respondents 1, 2, 3, has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. In view of above, the writ petition shall stand dismissed as not pressed. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 6, 2026 safi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Singh, Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Ansar Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad