Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14259 (JHR)

ANIRBAN KAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Cont.(Cvl)/667/2025 · 2026-02-13

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3959 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 667 of 2025 ------ Anirban Kar, aged about 47 years, son of Shree Ashok Kumar Kar, resident of Village-Tilatand, PO-Katras Bazar, PS-Katras & Dist- Dhanbad. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The State of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, PO-Dhurwa, PS-Jagannathpur, Dist-Ranchi. 3. Shri Praveen Kumar Toppo, Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, PO & PS-Dhurva, Dist-Ranchi. 4. Shri Jitendra Kumar Singh, Secretary, Mines & Geology Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, PO & PS-Doranda, Dist-Ranchi. 5. Ms. Madhavi Mishra, Deputy Commissioner-cum-Managing Director, Jharia Rehabilitation and Development Authority, (JRDA), Dhanbad PO & PS-Dhanbad, Dist-Dhanbad. 6. Sadat Anwar, Deputy Development Commissioner, Dhanbad- cum-Project Director, Jharia Rehabilitation and Development Authority, (JRDA), Dhanbad PO & PS-Dhanbad, Dist- Dhanbad. 7. Ms. Susma Anand, Block Development Office, Baghmara, PO & PS-Baghmara, Dist-Dhanbad. 8. Shri Abhishek Banerjee, Manager (Personnel), Jharia Rehabilitation and Development Authority, (JRDA), Dhanbad PO & PS-Dhanbad, Dist-Dhanbad. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Mukul Kr. Singh, AC to GP-III ------ 06/ 13th February,2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 15.01.2024 passed in WP(S) No.525 of 2021 has been complied with by passing a reasoned order. 2. Since the reasoned order has been passed in compliance of order dated 15.01.2024, no contempt is made out, thus, this contempt application is dropped. 3. However, petitioner is at liberty to challenge the aforesaid 2026:JHHC:3959 2 reasoned order before appropriate forum, if he is aggrieved. 4. Pending IAs, if any, also stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13.02.2026 S.K.D. Uploaded on 16.02.2026