Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20602 WP No. 32323 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 32323 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. NARAYANAREDDY SON OF LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, RESIDING AT B.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT - 562 106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL T, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
CHIEF SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE - 562 106.
3.
THE THASIDLHAR ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT - 562 106.
4.
REVENUE INSPECTOR
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20602 WP No. 32323 of 2024
SARJAPUR CIRCLE, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT - 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 23/9/2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 IN L.N.D(S) CR NO. 450/1991-1992 ORDERED FOR REJECTING THE APPLICATION CLAIMING THE REGULARIZATION OF OCCUPANCY RIGHTS ON THE BASIS OF BAGUR HUKAM CULTIVATION WITH RESPECT TO SY NO. 85 MEASURING 2 ACRE 00 GUNTAS OF B.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE. SARAJAPUR CIRCLE, BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT AT ANNEXURE- F AND TO GRANT SUCH ANEKAL TALUK OTHER RELIEF OR RELIEFS AS A SITUATION DEMANDS TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed:
"Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20602 WP No. 32323 of 2024
Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7