Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14256 (AP)

MULAKAYALA MURALI MOHAN REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/851/2026 · 2026-01-07

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010001552026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 851/2026 Between: 1. MULAKAYALA MURALI MOHAN REDDY, S/O RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, R/O POLL VILLAGE, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT - 516126. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AT AMARAVATI - 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ROYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT - 516269. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET REVENUE DIVISION, RAJAMPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT - 516115. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAJAMPET MANDAL, RAJAMPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT - 516115. 5. PALURU NARASIMHULU, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, A.P.HOUSING BOARD COLONY, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT - 516004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of (a) the 3rd respondent herein in not passing any orders on the appeal and the stay application filed by the petitioner on 01.09.2025 against the orders of the 4th respondent in Ref No B/523/2024 dated 17.04.2025 and (b) the 4th respondent and the officials of the 4th respondent in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the subject property admeasuring Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.205-1, Ac.2.18 cents in Sy.No207-1 AND Ac.2.28 cents in Sy.No.207-2 situated in Brahmanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District during the pendency of appeal filed before 3rd respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to Article 300A of Constitution of India and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the respondents not to interfere with the subject land and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject land admeasuring Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.205-1, Ac.2.18 cents in Sy.No:207-1 & Ac.2.28 cents in Sy.No.207-2 situated in Brahmanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a Writ or an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of a the 3rd respondent herein in not passing any orders on the appeal and the stay application filed by the petitioner on 01 09 2025 against the orders of the 4th respondent in Ref No B/523/2024 dated 17 04 2025 and b the 4th respondent and the officials of the 4th respondent in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the subject property admeasuring Ac 0 50 cents in Sy No 2051 Ac 2 18 cents in Sy No2071 AND Ac 2 28 cents in Sy No 2072 situated in Brahmanapalli Village Rajampet Mandal Annamayya District during the pendency of appeal filed before 3rd respondent as illegal irregular irrational violative of principles of natural justice contrary to Article 300A of Constitution of India and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the respondents not to interfere with the subject land and to pass such other order or orders...” 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the action of the 3rd respondent in not passing any orders on the appeal and the stay application filed by the petitioner on 01.09.2025, challenging the orders of the 4th respondent in Ref. No. B/523/2024 dated 17.04.2025 and the 4th respondent and the officials subordinate to the 4th respondent in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property admeasuring Ac. 0.50 cents in Sy.No.205-1, Ac.2.28 cents in Sy.No.207-2 situated at Brahmanapalli Village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District, during the pendency of the appeal before the 3rd respondent. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Consider the same, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.5 to consider the application dated 01.09.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH 08.01.2026 rmd THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 851/2026 08.01.2026 rmd