SURAJ KUMAR ALIAS SURAJ RAI ALIAS SURAJ KUMAR RAY ALIAS S.KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11579/2025 · 2026-03-12
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14255 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14255 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6748
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.11579 of 2025
----- Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Rai @ Suraj Kumar Ray @ S. Kumar, son of late Ram Sumar Ray, resident of S Type, 22/1, New Housing Colony, near Hanuman Mandir, Adityapur, PO Adityapur, PS Adityapur, District Seraikela-Kharsawan, Jharkhand
… Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhouri Awinash Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, APP For the Informant : Mr. Rishi Ranjan Vats, Advocate …......
04 /12.03.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 109, 103, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant and have also gone through the impugned order.
3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
4. The deceased left his home as per FIR on 08.07.2025 at 12:30 in the day time. By the evening, he did not return then the informant who happens to be brother of the deceased called his friend who informed that they were returning. However, at 10:30 at night he received a call from Amit Sharma that the deceased was being assaulted by this petitioner and two others.
5. The case of one of the co-accused, namely, Dharnidas @ Prashanto has been rejected by the coordinate Bench of this Court in BA No. 11854 of 2025. The coordinate Bench took into
consideration that one Amit Sharma has named this petitioner in commission of the offence.
2026:JHHC:6748
2
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Bistupur PS Case No. 111 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur stands rejected, at this stage.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
8. It is open to the petitioner to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after examination of Amit Sharma who is claimed to be the eye-witness.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 12.03.2026 Tanuj/CP-3
Uploaded on 17.03.2026