APHC010003152023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 15/2023 Between: 1. SYED SIDDIQUE AHMED, S/O TAILOR IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, SHEER AHMED STREET, VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 2. SYED SULEMAN, S/O LATE S. MEER HUSSAIN AGED 65 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS OPP. ZPPH SCHOOL, R/O VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MNADAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MULLA ABDUL RUB, S/O M.ABDUL JABBAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE R/O H.NO. 19-1--17E, GANDHI NAGAR, MADEENAPURA STREET VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2. GOUNDA MOHAMMED LQBAL, S/O G.ABDUL GAFFUR AGED 64 YEARS, MUSLIOM, RETIRED TEACHER, NEAR RTC BUS STAND, GANDHINAGAR, VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 3. J MALIK AHMMED, S/O PAPABHAIGARI JAMAL SAB AGED 63 YEARS, MUSIM, RETIRED RTC DRIVER DWARAKA NAGAR, R/O VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 4. MULLA MUHAMMED YUSUF, S/O LATE M.MOHARNMED HUSSAIN AGED 59 YEARS, CARPENTER MULLAN STREET R/O VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 2 5. MULLA MUHAMMAD HANIF, S/O LATE M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED 57 YEARS, OCC BUINSS R/O MULLA STREET, VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 6. MULLA ABDUL SALAM, S/O LATE M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED 55 YEARS, CARPENTER, MADDENNPUR STREET R/O VELUGODU VILLAGE , AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 7. MULLA ABDUL REHAMAN, S/O LATE M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED 54 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O MULAN STREET VELUGODU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay pleased to allow the above C.R.P. by setting aside the order dt. 28-11-2022 passed in I.A. No. 192 of 2022 in O.S. No. 31 of 2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the order and decree in I.A. No. 192 of 2022 in O.S. No. 31 of 2016 dated 28-11-2022 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge , Atmakur Pending disposal of the main C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 19.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 27th January, 2026 JLV 4 280 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 15/2023 Date: 27th January, 2026 JLV