1 APHC010003832026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1351/2026 Between: 1. M/S AKSHAYA TRANSPORT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, LINGAMANENI SIVA KUMAR, S/O. BAGAVAN NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 5-08-1422, FLAT NO. 210, DHANALAKSHMI TOWERS, PADMAJA NAGAR, KANURU SIDHARDHA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, 0PP. ROAD TADIGADAPA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, , 3,4,5, FLOORS, PRIME HICREST, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522501 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , KRISHNA DISTRICT AT 2 MACHILIPATNAM. 521101 5. THE YSR TADIGADAPA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, YSR TADIGADAPA, PORANKI, KRISHNA DISTRICT.521101 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, YSR TADIGADAPA MUNICIPALITY, PORANKI, KRISHNA DISTRICT,521137 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI,STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPALITIES 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P. Kameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for YSR Tadigadapa Municipality. 2. Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for YSR Tadigadapa Municipality has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Tadigadapa Municipality dated 30.03.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the due amount has been paid to the Writ Petitioner. 3 4. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, confirms this position that the amount has been received and no further consideration is necessary. 5. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:31.03.2026 Vns