Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14244 (MAD)

Sathiyamoorthy v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/7502/2026 · 2026-03-25

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2026 Sathiyamoorthy …. Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Chennai District. Crime No.145 of 2026 ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.145 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Dinesh For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(a), 296(b), 115(2) of BNS Act and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.145 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that, due to previous enmity, petitioner attacked the defacto complainant’s brother and also misbehaved with the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would reiterate the prosecution submitted that in the alleged occurrence, no one sustained injuries, however he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 5. Though, in the alleged occurrence no one sustained injuries, considering the conduct of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the petitioners does not deserve anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25.03.2026 sma 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2026 To 1.The Inspector of Police, H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Chennai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2026 25.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis