Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14244 (HP)

SATYA DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CMP/15854/2026 · 2026-07-06

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Satya Devi Vs. State & Ors. CMP No. 15854/2026 in CWP No. 9707/2025 06.07.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocates General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. The main writ petition was disposed of on 07.07.2025 with following order: - “In light of the issue raised in this writ petition, without making any observation on the merit of the case, the same is disposed of with the direction that let the Deputy Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala, take a call on the representation of the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, within a period of six weeks from today, in accordance with law, by adhering to the principles of natural justice after hearing the petitioner and alleged encroachers and if any encroachment is found, then appropriate action be taken against said encroacher(s), in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 2. The petitioner has moved this application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking direction to take appropriate legal action against encroachers on the Government land within time bound manner preferably within three months. The decision rendered in (CWP No.9707/2025) Satya Devi Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. cannot be modified in the manner as exhorted for the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for execution/modification/review of the aforesaid order. In view of above, the instant application to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 6th July, 2026 (Rohit)