Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1424 (UTT)

SHAHID v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/242/2026 · 2026-02-25

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C528 No. 242 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned D.A.G. for the State. 3. Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. By way of the present Amendment Application (MCRC No. 3 of 2026), applicant seeks to amend Section 118(2) of BNS, which was wrongly transcribed as Section 426(2) of BNS in the present criminal misc. application alongwith the compounding application and also in the order dated 25.02.2026. 5. The Amendment Application is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the Amendment Application is allowed. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to file the amended memo/copy of the application within two weeks. 7. List after two weeks. (Alok Mahra J.) 27.03.2026 Ujjwal