APHC010001362023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 69/2023 Between: 1. SHAIK HAMEEDUNNISA, W/O. CHANDSAHEB, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. TETTU VILLAGE, GUDLURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PANCHAYAT WING, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GUDLURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. MOCHARLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY-CUM-EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY, MOCHARLA VILLAGE, GUDLURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDLURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE 2 DISTRICT. 8. SHAIK MASTAN GOWSE, S/O. CHINIGISHA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC EX-SURPANCH, R/O. TETTU VILLAGE, GUDLURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 1 to 7 in not initiating any steps on petitioner's petition dated 12.12.2022, submitted for prevention of illegal and unauthorized construction being undertaken by the 8th respondent in Government Poramboku land situated in R.S.No.208 and its sub divisions of Mocherla Revenue Village by encroaching petitioner's part of lands situated towards Western side in Survey Nos. 231-1, 231-2, 232-1, 232- 2 and 208-A of Mocherla Revenue Village in Gudluru Mandal of S.P.S.RNellore District, within the Grama Panchayat Limits of the 5th respondent, without obtaining necessary permission and approved plan from the 5th respondent, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly the respondents 5 and 7 to protect said government lands without allowing any construction thereof and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly respondents 5 & 7 to stop illegal and unauthorized construction being undertaken by the 8th respondent in Government Poramboku land situated in R.S.No.208 and its sub divisions of Mocherla Revenue Village by encroaching petitioner's part of lands situated towards Western side in Survey Nos. 231-1, 231-2, 232-1, 232-2 & 208-A of Mocherla Revenue Village in Gudluru Mandal of S.P.S.RNellore District, within the Grama Panchayat Limits of the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 3 1. SUDHANAGUNTA SWETHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY 4. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following order: The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of respondents 1 to 7 in not initiating any steps on the petitioners’ representation dated 12.12.2022, submitted for the prevention of illegal and unauthorised construction undertaken by the 8th respondent in Government Poramboku land, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. On 07.03.2023, a learned Coordinate bench of this Court passed the following order: “Learned Standing counsel for the Gram Panchayat placed a copy of communication received from the 8th respondent for perusal of this Court, from a reading of which it would appear that at the instance of the Gram Panchayat construction activity in R.S.No.208 has been stopped.” 3. The writ petition was adjourned to file counter-affidavits. 4. Thereafter, the writ petition was listed on 26.11.2025 and 29.12.2025. On both occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner; the writ petition was adjourned to 21.01.2026. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 21.01.2026, the writ petition was adjourned today to list under the caption “for dismissal” 4 5. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 6. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 28.01.2026 SNI 5 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.69 of 2023 Dated: 28.01.2026 SNI