RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14385/2026 · 2026-10-05
Dinesh Pathak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14238 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14238 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14385 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Shri Brajesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.2 & 3, and Shri Krishna Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.01.2026, whereby he has been placed under suspension.
3. Pursuant to the order dated 10.09.2026 passed by this Court, Shri Krishna Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 has placed before the Court today a photostat copy of order dated 05.10.2026 passed by the competent authority, whereby disciplinary proceedings has been dropped and the petitioner has been reinstated in service. Copy of the order dated 05.10.2026 is taken on record. He further contends that in view of the order dated 05.10.2026, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant writ petition; therefore, same may be dismissed as infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the aforesaid contention.
5. As such, instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2026 VR Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Brajesh Pratap Singh, C.S.C., Krishna Agarawal (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Rajeev Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad