Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14237 (AP)

J. RAMA SUNDARA RAO v. PEEYUSH KUMAR

CC/21/2025 · 2026-02-01

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010001542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 21/2025 Between: 1. J. RAMA SUNDARA RAO, S/O. RAMA MOHANA RAO AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. H.N0.7C-9-11/1, CHATAPARRU ROAD, EASTERN STREET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. K VETRI SELVI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI VENKATESWARA RAO MAMIDI, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. DEVA PRAKASH CHILAKAPAT, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (IRRIGATION CIRCLE), IRRIGATION WORKS, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. SRI PAMMI NAGARJUNA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GODAVARI WESTERN DIVISION, NIDADAVOLU.WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 21.02.2024 passed in W.P No. 1209 of 2023 by Honble Sri JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 21/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 21.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1209 of 2023. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 21.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1209 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.02.2026 TTPPSS 4 31 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 21/2025 02.02.2026 TTPPSS