PANCHANAN DUTTA v. THE NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/5422/2024 · 2026-09-13
Kaushik Goswami
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14236 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14236 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010218362024
2026:GAU-AS:13471
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5422/2024 PANCHANAN DUTTA S/O LATE ANANDA RAM DUTTA, R/O LONPURIA GAON, P.O.- KALOO GAON, P.S.-AMGURI, DIST- SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR (CMD), NEDFI HOUSE, G.S. ROAD, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER PFD (SAMC) NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED NEDFI HOUSE G.S. ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED NEDFI HOUSE G.S. ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R PHUKAN, MR. R MAHANTA,MR. P TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S DUTTA (R-1,2,3), MR K KASHYAB(R-1,2,3)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 14.09.2026 None appears for the petitioner despite the matter being called twice. Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondents is present. It seems that on 14.07.2026 also, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. However, on the last occasion, i.e., 17.08.2026, the petitioner was represented and on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was fixed today to enable the petitioner to file rejoinder. However, despite the matter being fixed today, the rejoinder has not been filed. It is also to be noted that despite the matter having been called twice today, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It further appears that the names of the learned counsel for the petitioner are reflected in the cause list. That being so, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant