SIDHARTHA EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION v. INCOME TAX OFFICER
WP/6442/2026 · 2026-03-04
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14229 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14229 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13390 WP No. 6442 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 6442 OF 2026 (T-IT) BETWEEN:
1.
SIDHARTHA EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, NO.17, 26TH CROSS, 25A MAIN, BANGALORE-HSSR LAYOUT SECTOR-II, BANGALORE - 560 102.
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SMT. C.P. DHANALAKSHMI REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.V. SESHACHALA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NAGHARISH G.S, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-3, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027.
2.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13390 WP No. 6442 of 2026 C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
3.
ASSESSMENT UNIT, FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001 REP. BY ASSESSING OFFICER.
4.
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NO.412-413, IST FLOOR, OPP. METRO PILLAR NO. 793 DWARKA MOR, NEW DELHI - 110 059.
REP. BY ASSESSING OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND V CHAVAN, ADVOCATE) ***
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. QUASH THE ATTACHMENT ORDER DATED 08.12.2025 BEARING NO.ITBA/COM/F/27/2025-26/1083430641(1) ANNEXURE- V ISSUED TO THE INDIAN BANK AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13390 WP No. 6442 of 2026 ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has sought for setting aside the order of attachment at Annexure-V relating to the bank account of the petitioner. The petitioner has also sought for setting aside the assessment
order dated 21.09.2021 at Annexure-T, as well as the penalty orders at Annexure-W and X. Further, the petitioner has sought for treating the original return as a response to the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the assessment order as regards the Assessment Year 2015-16 was passed on
21.09.2021. It is submitted that the registered email ID of the petitioner remained the same from the Assessment Year 2016-17 till 2020-21 and thereafter, from 2021 onwards till 2024-25, the registered email Id was is found in the table at paragraph 15 of the petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13390 WP No. 6442 of 2026
3. It is further submitted that the assessment
order passed was not communicated to the petitioner either through the registered email Id as found in the table at paragraph 15, or by way of mobile alert. It is submitted that even otherwise the lapse was due to bona fide reasons and that such lapse be condoned and appropriate orders be passed.
4. It is submitted that all communications by the department appears to have been sent to an email Id other than the current registered email Id. Such factual aspect is not controverted. Learned counsel for the revenue submits that the details of the orders were uploaded on the portal and therefore, the petitioner ought to have been diligent.
5. However, taking note of the facts as noticed and also considering that there was a legitimate expectation that the orders would be communicated to the
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13390 WP No. 6442 of 2026 registered email ID, which has not been done, it will be appropriate to set aside the order at Annexure-T.
6. The matter is remitted to the post notice stage under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. All contentions are kept open.
7. Consequently, the order of attachment at Annexure-V is required to be rescinded by the department forthwith. Further, the consequential orders at Annexures- W and X are also set aside.
8. Accordingly, the writ petitioner is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20