Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14222 (CHH)

MAGRITA TOPPO v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1471/2026 · 2026-04-20

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18001 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1471 of 2026 Magrita Toppo D/o Laurence Toppo Aged About 48 Years Principal At Government Girls Higher Secondary School Kirandul, Block Kuakonda, District Dantewada (C.G.) ... Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - District Education Officer-Cum-1st Appellate Authority Public Information Officer District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Block Education Officer-Cum-Public Information Officer Block Kuakonda District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Chief Executive Officer-Cum-Public Information Officer Zila Panchayat Dantewada District Dantewada (C.G.) 6 - Rampati Sharma Bureau Chief Of Amar Ujala R/o- Near Dairy Farm Kirandul District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Vikash Kingrani R/503, Raheja Residency Opposite Ryan International School Labhandi Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Chief Information Commissioner Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Sector-19 North Block, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For Res No.1 to 4/ State : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, PL. For Res No.5 : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate. For Res No.8 : Mr. Shyam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 21/04/2026 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file better constituted petition in accordance with law. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid limited prayer, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay