Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14220 (JHR)

HASIM SHEKH ALIAS HASIM SEIKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./667/2026 · 2026-03-13

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:6851 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 667 of 2026 Hasim Shekh @ Hasim Seikh aged about 32 years, son of Srafat Shekh, resident of village-Kandra, P.O. Ramnagar Garh, P.S. Mahuda, District Dhanbad … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.P. Jha, APP --- 03/13.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025 in connection with Katras (East Basuria) P.S. Case No. 279 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 310(2) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. There is neither any recovery from the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put under TIP. The learned counsel has also submitted that some of the co-accused namely Sk. Afsar@ Sheikh Badshah and Manjur Sekh have been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Benches of this court vide order dated 09.01.2026 in ABA No. 7533 of 2025 and vide order dated 22.12.2025 in ABA No. 7387 of 2025 respectively. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025 and charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co-accused and the petitioner has said to have confessed his guilt, but there is no incriminating substance recovered from the petitioner nor ( 2026:JHHC:6851 ) 2 the petitioner has been put on TIP, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Katras (East Basuria) P.S. Case No. 279 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 13.03.2026 Uploaded on:13.03.2026 Binit/