RITIKA AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, GANDHI NAGAR, JAMMU AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/500/2026 · 2026-06-05
Rajesh Sekhri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1422 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1422 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 500/2026
202
Ritika & Anr.
…..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Koshal Parihar, Advocate. q
vs
UT of J&K & Anr. .….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. P.D Singh, Dy. AG. Mr. Pragwal Parihar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 05.06.2026
01. Statements of the petitioners and respondent No. 2, at whose instance FIR No. 05/2016 came to be registered and culminated in the impugned charge-sheet, have been reduced into writing before learned Registrar Judicial of this Court. The complainant/the private respondent has stated that she has resolved the dispute and all the issues with the petitioners and a compromise deed has been executed. She has further stated that she has no grievance against the petitioners now and has no objection to the quashment of the impugned charge-sheet.
02. Parties have been identified by their respective counsels.
03. In view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, present petition is allowed and impugned charge-sheet qua the petitioners is quashed.
04.
Disposed of along with connected application(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 05.06.2026 Abinash
41