Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14219 (JHR)

SATARI SIRKA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1491/2026 · 2026-03-18

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:7560 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No. 1491 of 2026 Satari Sirka --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State: Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. --- 02 / 18.03.2026 Heard Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Tonto P.S. Case No. 31 of 2024. 3. The husband of the informant was murdered by the petitioner and other accused persons. 4. It has been submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the informant was away in a maize field when the incident had occurred. 5. Learned Counsel submits that the incident had occurred on account of a land dispute. He has also stated that the petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2024. 6. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 7. It seems that there are eye-witnesses to the occurrence who had seen the assault committed upon the husband of the informant by the petitioner. 8. It further appears that out of 11 charge-sheet witnesses, 04 witnesses have been examined till date. ( 2026:JHHC:7560 ) 9. On consideration of the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is hereby rejected. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) P.K.S. Uploaded