Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14218 (ORI)

SUKANTA ROUT v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/13243/2026 · 2026-05-02

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.13243 of 2026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 02.05.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3. The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition by issuing Rule Nisi calling upon the Opposite Parties more particularly the Opposite Party No.2 to show cause as to why the Mutation applications of the petitioners vide Annexure-1 series shall not be accepted by the O.P. No.2 and accordingly, the said purchased land of the petitioners may be mutated in their favour for the interest of justice; And may pass any such other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon’ble Court think just and proper for the interest of justice; And for which act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. Considering the fact that the petitioners have already submitted Mutation application in the online mode, the writ Sukanta Rout & Others .… Petitioners Represented by Mr. R. Mohanty, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha &Another .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. S.N. Patnaik, Additional Government Advocate Order No. 01. . p. 2 application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Chandbali to register such application and to deal with it in accordance with law as early as possible. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Puspanjali Designation: Junior Stenographer Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.