Mustafa so Fattusab Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra
CP/877/2025 · 2026-09-30
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14218 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14218 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
870.2025CP+ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 870 OF 2025 IN WP/3564/2024 VIVEKANAND SO BHAGWAN KAMBLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 959 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 873 OF 2025 IN WP/3522/2024 MOHAN SO KISAN WAGALGAVE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 960 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 877 OF 2025 IN WP/3519/2024 MUSTAFA SO FATTUSAB SHAIKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.G.Rudrawar AGPs for Respondent/State : Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut, Mr.A.S. Shinde and Mrs. U.S. Bhosale Advocate for Respondent nos.3 and 4 : Mr. U.B. Bondar ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 30.09.2026 P.C. :
1.
Learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4 submits that the petitions have become infructuous since the same are in respect of transfers for the academic year 2025-
2026. 2026:BHC-AUG:46077-DB
870.2025CP+ 2
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, in all these three matters, confirms the said fact, but sought liberty to file fresh applications for transfer in coming academic year.
3. In view of the same, all these petitions stand
disposed of with liberty as prayed.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga