APHC010003792013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1105/2013 Between: 1. SRI MAHANANDI KSHETRA ARYAVYSYA NITYANNA SATRA SANGHAM,, (A REGISTERED BODY UNDER SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT VIDE REGISTRATION NO. 255/1991) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI. ATMAKURU SUDARSANAM CHETTY, S/O. ATMAKURU NAGABHUSHANAM CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O.H.NO. 28-2, A.N.C. AGRO MILLS, NOONEPALLI, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT . ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K V SAGAR BABU, Executive Officer Sri Mahanandeeswara Swamy Vari Devasthanam Mahanandi, Kurnool District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to enquire into the matter and punish the respondent for violation of orders dt: 15-5-2013 passed by His Lordships Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy, in W.P.M.P.No.17817 of 2013 in W.P.No 14659 of 2013 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V HARI HARAN Counsel for the Contemnor: 2 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1105/2013 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner herein is that this Court passed an interim order dated 15.05.2013 in W.P.No.14659 of 2013 granting interim stay of auction notice dated 01.05.2013 for conducting public auction on 20.05.2013 to allot the plots. In view of stay of public auction, the respondent authorities cannot be allowed to continue the auction without issuing any fresh public auction. 3. The order of this Court dated 15.05.2013 cannot be enforced since, the period of the notice itself is not in existence. Further, pending the contempt case, the Writ Petition was already dismissed for default. Even in this contempt case, the petitioner never represented the matter. Hence, the contempt case becomes infructuous and liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 TTPPSS 4 194 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1105/2013 31.03.2026 TTPPSS