1 2026:HHC:26685 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 609 of 2026 Decided on: 06.07.2026 ________________________________________________ Saroj Kumari ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 16.06.2026, alongwith copy of Office Order of even date, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent/Department vide Office Order dated 16.06.2026 by passing a detailed speaking order. 2. Since judgment under reference stands duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:26685 passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail Office Order dated 16.06.2026 in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 6th June, 2026 Judge (raman)