Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14211 (MAD)

R.BALAMBAL v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION

WP/6911/2026 · 2026-03-04

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 6911 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 6911 of 2026 R.Balambal ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General Of Registration No.100, Near Amma Unavagam, Pattinampakkam, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai-600 028 2. The District Registrar (North Chennai) No.62 Perambur Barracks Road, Chennai-600 007 3. The Sub Registrar Padapai, Chennai -601 301 ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 3rd Respondent to implement the order No.12823/A3/2014 dated 02.11.2015 passed by the 2nd Respondent and permit the petitioner to executive the further documents pertaining to Survey No.241/2A2 and 241/2B, situated at Varadharajapuram Village, Kundrathu Panchayat Union, Sriperumbuthur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.U.Gowri Shankar For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan, SGP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6911 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to implement the order passed by the second respondent dated 02.11.2015 in respect of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. 2. In the aforesaid order dated 02.11.2015 passed by the second respondent, the petitioner claims that certain documents were ordered to be cancelled. But, till date, the said order has not been implemented. The petitioner had given given representations to the respondents, which includes the last representation dated 09.06.2025, seeking for implementation of the order passed by the second respondent dated 02.11.2015. Since the said representations have not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6911 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 09.06.2025 seeking for implementation of the order dated 02.11.2015 passed by the second respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner. No Costs. 04-03-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1. The Inspector General Of Registration No.100, Near Amma Unavagam, Pattinampakkam, Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate, Chennai-600 028 2. The District Registrar (North Chennai) No.62 Perambur Barracks Road, Chennai-600 007 3. The Sub Registrar Padapai, Chennai -601 301 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6911 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 6911 of 2026 04-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis