10886.2026CA+ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10886 OF 2026 IN CP/421/2025 ATUL SO VASANTRAO WARANGULRE VERSUS FULCHAND SO GOVINDRAO MALI AND OTHERS WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 421 OF 2025 IN WP/11188/2024 ATUL SO VASANTRAO WARANGULE VERSUS FULCHAND SO GOVINDRAO MALI AND OTHERS WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 422 OF 2025 NITIN SO MEGHRAJ GAIKWAD VERSUS FULCHAND SO GOVINDRAO MALI AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10889 OF 2026 IN CP/422/2025 NITIN SO MEGHRAJ GAIKWAD VERSUS FULCHAND SO GOVINDRAO MALI AND OTHERS ... Mr. Subodh Shah h/f Mr.Madake D.A., Advocate for applicants. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut Mr. N.B. Khandare, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. D.J. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent no.1. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 30.09.2026 P.C. : 1. Heard for some time. 2026:BHC-AUG:46074-DB 10886.2026CA+ 2 2. Under the order dated 24th July, 2026, we had directed respondent no.4 to determine the exact amount payable to the petitioners in terms of the order under contempt. Accordingly, respondent no.4 has calculated the amount payable to both these petitioners and submitted the chart on record. 3. As per the said chart, petitioner – Atul Vasantrao Warangule is entitled for getting the total amount of Rs.63,08,103/-, whereas petitioner - Nitin Beghraj Gaikwad is entitled for getting the total amount of Rs.61,67,729/-. 4. Under the same order, we had asked respondent no.1 to deposit the amount of Rs.23,26,343/- for petitioner – Warangule and the amount of Rs.17,73,884/- for petitioner – Gaikwad. Admittedly, these amounts are deposited with this Court. 5. Learned Senior counsel Mr. Khandare disputed the amount calculated by respondent no.4 and submitted that the calculations are made by respondent no.1 – Management by deducting the amount of salary of the petitioners for the period they did not work on their posts. 6. Under such circumstances, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent no.1 to deposit the amounts calculated by respondent no.4 with this Court, after deducting the amounts which are already deposited, within eight weeks. 7. It is made clear that the disputed amount will not be allowed to be disbursed to the petitioners and it would subject to further consideration. 10886.2026CA+ 3 8. At present, we allow the petitioners to withdraw whatever amounts deposited by respondent no.1 along with accrued interest thereon till date. The issue as to what is the proper amount payable to the petitioners is kept open. 9. Civil Application nos.10886 of 2026 and 10889 of 2026 are accordingly disposed of. 10. List the Contempt Petitions on 09.12.2026. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga