MD. FARHAN THROUGH HIS FATHER MD. ALI HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
C.M.P./95/2026 · 2026-02-13
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14209 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14209 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:4505 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 95 of 2026
------ Md. Farhan, aged about 18 years, through his father Md. Ali Hussain, son of late Mahbood Hussain, resident of Gram Ara, Dumerbera, P.O.-Sarubera, P.S.-Mandu, Dist.-Ramgarh
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam, Limited through its Chairman Cum Managing Director, having its office at Engineering Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi
.... .... .... Opp. Parties
------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Faiz, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Prabhat Kumar, SC II
: Mr. Shrish Mazumdar, AC to SC II
For Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. Mohan Kr. Dubey, Advocate
------
Order No.02 Dated- 13.02.2026
Heard the parties.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 to its original file.
It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 was dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order of depositing Rs.1,000/- with JHALSA. It is then submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as the father of the petitioner who is representing the petitioner has gone outside the State hence, the said amount of Rs.1,000/- with JHALSA could not be deposited within the stipulated time and the same resulted in dismissal of Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017. It is next submitted that the said amount has been deposited with JHALSA. It is further submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 and unless Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced.
Hence, it is submitted that Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 be restored to its original file.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal.
List Writ Petition (C) No.7717 of 2017 under the appropriate heading after a week.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
13.02.2026 Sonu/Gunjan-