1 2026:CGHC:19226 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3584 of 2026 1 - Smt. Murai Kashyap W/o Late Lachhin Kashyap Aged About 48 Years R/o- Badnjey Apara, Kurenga, Bademoratpal, Baster District- Baster (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Chief Engineer Public Works Department (B And R), Zone Baster, Jagdalpur, District- Baster (C.G.) 3 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department (B And R), North Baster Division No.-1, Jagdalpur, District- Baster (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 27/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is legal representative of deceased employee, who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employee was entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of 2 C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submits representation, her claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off with aforesaid observation and direction. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY