Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14208 (JHR)

M/S MOTTO CARE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, KAILASH YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS CHIEF MANAGER (AUTHORIZED OFFICER), CANARA BANK

WPC/6716/2025 · 2026-03-12

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6598 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6716 of 2025 M/S MOTTO CARE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, KAILASH YADAV aged about 51 years Son of Late Kashi Chaudhary, Ranchi Complex, Kanta Toli, Shop No. 3, Opposite War Cementary, Ranchi- 834001, Jharkhand. At present Resident of Quarter No. DT- 2977, Pani Tanki Side, Post Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi-834004, State Jharkhand. …....... Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. CANARA BANK, represented thorough its Chief Manager (Authorized Officer), Canara Bank (Syndicate Bank) Asset Recovery Management Branch, Patna Ground Floor, Luv Kush Tower, Exhibition Road, P.O. G.P.O., Patna, District- Patna, Bihar-800001. 2. General Manager, Canara Bank, Camac Street, PO. Park Street, P.S. Park Street. Kolkata, West Bengal. 700016 3. Branch Manager, Canara Bank (Syndicate Bank), Lady K.C. Roy Memorial School Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi, District- Ranchi. 4. Deputy Commissioner cum District Magistrate, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi, State Jharkhand. 6. District Certificate Officer, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi, State Jharkhand. 7. Thana Inspector (Incharge), Hatia, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Hatia, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 8. Union of India ........ Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, A.C to Sr. S.C.-I For the Resp.-U.O.I : Mr. H. K. Mahato, Sr. Panel Counsel For the Resp.-Bank : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate 03/12.03.2026 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents are present and do not object to the prayer. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of as withdrawn. 4. Pending I.A. also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 12.03.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026