Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14207 (JHR)

DR. MD. SAKUR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/399/2026 · 2026-01-28

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2110 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 399 of 2026 ------ Dr. Md. Sakur Ansari, aged about 63 years, Son of Md. Rajak Ansari, Resident of Village-Bararhi (Suravarke), Natwar Kalan, Natwar, Rohtas, PO & PS-Bararhi Suravarke, Dist-Rohtas, Bihar. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand at Ranchi, Office at Nepal House, PO & PS-Doranda, District-Ranchi. 3. The District Ayush Medical Officer, Seraikella Kharsawan, PO & PS-Seraikella, Dist-Seraikella Kharswan. 4. The Accountant General ( A & E), Jharkhand Ranchi, office at A.G. Office, North Office Para, PO & PS-Doranda, Dist-Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Advocate Mr. Ramchander Sahu, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Nirupama, AC to Sr. SC-II Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate Ms. Ristheeta Singh, Advocate ------ 02/ 28th January, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that his 1st & 2nd ACP has not been granted, though, the petitioner has rendered 24 years of service. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that if the petitioner files a detailed representation before the District Ayush Medical Officer, Seraikella Kharsawan -respondent No.3, his case will be considered and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any benefit, the same will be extended to him. 4. Considering the submission of the parties, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation ventilating his grievance relating to ACPs within four weeks before the District Ayush Medical Officer, Seraikella Kharsawan -respondent No.3. On receipt of the said representation, the case of the petitioner will be considered within six weeks. 2026:JHHC:2110 2 5. If it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any benefit, the same will be disbursed within four weeks thereafter. 6. If any part of the claim of the petitioner is rejected, the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. 7. If the petitioner has some other grievance, the respondent will also address the same. 8. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. 9. Pending IAs, if any, also stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 28.01.2026 S.K.D.Cp-2 Uploaded on 29.01.2026