Indira Gautam vs. Kalyan Chand RSA No. 129/2026 03.07.2026 Present: Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Priyanka Chandel and Mr. Dhiraj Thakur, Advocates, for the respondent. CMP No. 11698/2026 It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that the appellant/applicant has not complied with provisions of Order 39 Rule 3 of CPC and, therefore, the interim order, dated 20.05.2026 deserves to be vacated. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant/applicant prays for and is granted permission to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file the same afresh. Consequently, interim order, dated 20.5.2026 is vacated and the application is dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty, as aforesaid. RSA No. 129/2026 It is represented by the learned counsel for the parties that an endeavour can be made to reconcile the matter inter se the parties. Before, sending the matter to mediation, let parties or their relatives/authorized representatives remain present before the Court on the next date of hearing. List on 07.07.2026. (Romesh Verma) Judge 03.07.2026 (pankaj)