Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14205 (AP)

E Venkataraman v. The District Collector

WP/30720/2013 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.30720_2013 APHC010001522013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30720/2013 Between: 1. E VENKATARAMAN,, S/O.RAMACHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT NANNURIVARIPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, PULICHERLA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DWMA CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE MPDO, PULICHERLA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioner to attend the duties as Field Assistants without any notice or opportunity and without there being any order of termination/suspension and without any notice or opportunity and no irregularities committed by the petitioners and not passing any order on representation dt.10.07.2012, as illegal arbitrary, high handed, violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be justified in the eye of law and consequently direct the respondents to retain and continue the petitioners as Field Assistants with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice 2 HN, J W.P.No.30720_2013 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 38142 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the petitioner in service as Field Assistant forthwith by considering his representation dt.10.07.2012 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV 3 HN, J W.P.No.30720_2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, virtually, submits that the petitioner has challenged the discontinuation of his services as Filed Assistant. 2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner continued in service till 2016, and thereafter he has not been in the service of the respondents in pursuance of the proceedings dated 25.04.2016. 3. Recording the same and taking the said proceedings dated 25.04.2016 on record, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.30720_2013 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30720 of 2013 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA