RAJIV SEHGAL AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/10342/2023 · 2026-10-08
Samit Gopal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14201 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14201 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10342 of 2023 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants- Rajiv Sehgal, Smt. Raj Sehgal, Satish Kumar Khanna, Poonam @ Poonam Aroda and Dinesh @ Dinesh Aroda, with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the summoning order dated 02.09.2021 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mainpuri as well as entire Complaint Case No. 1882 of 2020 (Smt. Anjali Sehgal Vs. Rajiv Sehgal and others), under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Bever, District Mainpuri, with a further prayer that proceedings of the aforesaid case be stayed. 4. The records show that the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 28.03.2023. Subsequently a time extension application was filed for extension of time to deposit the money as ordered which was allowed vide order dated 04.10.2023. The office through its report dated 06.11.2024 has placed on record a report of the Mediation Centre, a perusal of which goes to show that the Mediation Centre through its report dated 06.11.2024 has reported that the applicants have not complied with the orders dated 28.03.2023 and 04.10.2023 till 06.11.2024 and thus notices could not be issued to the parties for mediation. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Pandey, Rajesh Kumar Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajiv Sehgal And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Further the records show the matter was listed on 05.08.2026, 19.08.2026, 10.09.2026 and 24.09.2026 and on all dates there was no representation on behalf of the applicants. On 24.09.2026 the following order was passed by this Court:-
"1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. 3. Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present. 4.
Even previously on 05.08.2026, 19.08.2026 and 10.09.2026 there was no representation from the side of the applicants and the matter was adjourned on the said dates. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the applicants to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. even in the revised list. 5. A letter of Election Committee 2026-27 High Court Bar Association, Allahabad dated 24.09.2026 has been circulated to the Courts under order of Hon?ble The Senior Judge dated 24.09.2026 in which a prayer has been made for not passing any adverse order due to heavy rain in the city since morning. 6. In view of the same, the matter is adjourned for today. 7. Let the matter be listed on 09.10.2026 peremptorily."
6. Since today again there is no representation from the side of the applicants, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for non prosecution. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Office is directed to communicate this order to the District & Sessions Judge, Mainpur and Trial Court concerned within 04 from today for information and necessary action. 9. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. October 9, 2026 AS Rathore A482 No. 10342 of 2023 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad