Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 142 (UTT)

RANVEER SINGH SAINI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPPIL/101/2025 · 2026-04-08

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2026:UHC:2522-DB COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 08.04.2026 WPPIL No. 101 of 2025 Ranveer Singh Saini .....Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others ....Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. 1. Mr. Mukesh Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ranjan Ghildiyal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. The petitioner has not disclosed his credentials as required under Chapter XXI-A Rule 4(2) of the Rules of Court, 1952, and also in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in “State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and Others”, (2010) 3 SCC 402. 5. As we are not satisfied with the credentials and bonafides of the petitioner, therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed. 6. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 08.04.2026 08.04.2026 NISHANT