Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030000882026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/39/2026 ZWO (Zofa Welfare Organization) r/b K. Darsailova, President, ZWO Mizoram Societies Registration Act, 2006 bearing Redg No. MSR-477 of 12.11.2007 of 2012 VERSUS The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secretary and 6 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram Linked Case : PIL/3/2022 ZWO (Zofa Welfare Organization) R/b Rev. Robawia President ZWO Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS State of Mizoram and 6 Ors. Aizawl Mizoram 2:The Secretary/ Under Secretary Home Department Aizawl Aizawl Mizoram 3:The Chairman/ Secretary Planning Programme and Implementation Department Page No.# 2/3 Aizawl Mizoram 4:The Inspector General of Prison Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram. 5:Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Finance Dept. Aizawl Mizoram. 6:The Home Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Govt. of India North Block Cabinet Secretariat Raisina Hill New Delhi Pin- 110001. Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 03.03.2026 (Budi Habung, J.) Heard Ms. Rosalynn L. Hmar, learned counsel for the applicant. This is an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Order 1 Rule 8A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for impleadment of the names of 8(eight) parties mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of this application, as respondents in the connected PIL petition. Page No.# 3/3 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impleadment of the parties mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of this application, is necessary as they are the contractors who had carried-out the renovation work and construction projects of different jails in the State of Mizoram in terms of the approved designs, drawings and specifications. Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Addl. Advocate General, Mizoram, and Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC, appearing on behalf of their respective Opposite Parties, have no objection to the impleadment, as sought for by the applicant. Prayer, as sought for, is allowed. In view of the above, Registry shall implead the names of the parties mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of this interlocutory application as respondents No. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 15 in the connected PIL. The interlocutory application, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant