Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14199 (JHR)

SANJAY YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6473/2025 · 2026-03-18

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7529 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6446 of 2025 Dwarika Mahato @ Dwarika Yadav aged about 69 years, son of late Bandhu Mahato, resident of Ward No. 07, Dasharo Khurd, P.O. Dasharo, P.S.-Markacho, District- Koderma. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Rajesh Badri Yadav son of Badri Yadav, resident of Ward No.07, Dasharo Khurd, P.O. Dasharo, P.S.-Markacho, District- Koderma. … Opp. Parties with ABA No.6473 of 2025 1. Sanjay Yadav aged about 38 years, son of Dwarika Yadav @ Dwarika Mahto, resident of Ward No. 07, Dasharo Khurd, P.O. Dasharo, P.S. - Markacho, District - Koderma. 2. Birendra Yadav aged about 34 years, Dawarika Yadav @ Dawarika Mahto, resident of Ward No. 07, Dasharo Khurd, P.O. Dasharo P.S. Markacho, District Koderma. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Rajesh Badri Yadav son of Badri Yadav, resident of ward No. 07, Dasharo Khurd, P.O. Dasharo, P.S.-Markacho, District - Koderma. … Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Ranjan Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocate ------ 2/18.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The matters relate to Markacho P.S. Case No.36 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State and informant in both the cases jointly pointed out that now process under Section 85 of BNSS has already been executed. 2026:JHHC:7529 2 4. In course of argument, no exceptional circumstance is made out to entertain these petitions after the execution process under Section 85 of BNSS. 5. In view of that, these petitions are dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 18.03.2026 R.Kumar