2026:JHHC:4076 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6368 of 2011 --------- Prem Sagar Dubey, Son of Sri Hanumanth Dubey, resident of 205 Shubh Aprajetta Appartment, Nandan Puri P.O.-Khajpura, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, Dist.- Patna(Bihar). ......Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India, Ministry of Railway, Railway Board, through, the Director General, Railway Protection Force, Rail Bhawan P.O. & P.S.- Parliament Street, New Delhi. 2. The Chief Security Commissioner, (Railway Protection Force), East Central Railway Hazipur, P.O. Hazipur, P.S. Hazipur, District- Vaishali, Bihar. 3. The Deputy Chief Security Commissioner, (Railway Protection Force) RPF, East Central Railway, P.O. Hazipur P.S. Hazipur District- Vaishali Bihar. 4. The Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force East Central Railway, Dhanbad, P.O. Dhanbad, P.S. Sadar, District- Dhanbad. .....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : None For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. Bakshi Vibha, Advocate --------- 15/Dated:-13.02.2026 1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following relief: “For the issuance an appropriate writ's order, direction, setting aside the order dated 28.02.2008 whereby the respondent no.4 -cum- disciplinary authority has passed an order in connection with Charge Sheet no.PF/DHN/(8)-10/05/506 dated 2/4.08.2005 whereby differing with the findings of the enquiry officer has awarded a punishment to the petitioner for stoppage of the increment for the next two year with cumulative effect (Annexure 4) as also the order dated 30.10.2008 passed in Appeal by the Respondent no.3 -cum-Appellate Authority whereby and whereunder he has modified the order of punishment to the extent that the punishment granted to the petitioner has been reduced to with holding of increment temporarily (Annexure 6) as also the order dated 26.08.2009 (Annexure 7) passed by the Revisional authority, the respondent no.2 who has not interfered with the order of the Appellate Authority. The petitioner prays for the further direction upon the respondents to forthwith grant to him promotion in terms of the order dated 31.05.2010 whereby he has been selected for promoted to the post of Inspector Railway Protection Force and to further set aside the order of the respondent no.1 dated 1/3-4/4-2011, (Annexure 12) whereby his order of promotion has been kept in abeyance in view of the orders as contained in Annexure 4, 6 and 7.” 2. None appears for the petitioner. From record, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in this case long 2026:JHHC:4076 2 before. 3. Looking to the prayer made in this writ application, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this matter; accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) February 13, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 11.03.2026